# Tina

> LoRA-based RL post-training of a 1.5B model achieves competitive reasoning at 260x lower cost than prior SOTA

- Authors: Hunter
- Published: 2025-05-02
- Source: Bevaya Labs, <https://labs.bevaya.ai/>

---


# Tina: Tiny Reasoning Models via LoRA

**Paper**: [Tina: Tiny Reasoning Models via LoRA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15777)

**Presenter**: Hunter

**Note Taker**: Hunter

**Date**: May 2, 2025

---

## Overview
Tina demonstrates that strong reasoning ability can be developed in a 1.5B-parameter model via RL post-training with LoRA adapters, at dramatically lower cost than existing approaches. Post-training cost is under $9, representing an estimated 260× cost reduction compared to prior state-of-the-art reasoning models. The resulting model achieves 43.33% Pass@1 on AIME24, with over 20% improvement in reasoning performance relative to the base model. All code, training logs, and checkpoints are released.

---

## Novelty
- LoRA applied during RL post-training (not just SFT), keeping most base model weights frozen while adapting for reasoning.
- Demonstrates that RL reward shaping rapidly adapts the model to structured reasoning formats without full fine-tuning.
- Very low compute budget: post-training completes for under $9, making the recipe accessible to resource-constrained teams.
- Consistent hyperparameters validated across multiple reasoning benchmarks.

---

## Learnings
- LoRA adapters are sufficient for RL-based reasoning acquisition in small models; full fine-tuning is not required.
- RL reward shaping quickly instills structured reasoning behavior (e.g., chain-of-thought format) without large datasets.
- A 1.5B model with RL+LoRA can reach competitive reasoning performance, narrowing the gap with much larger models.
- The open-source release (weights, logs, code) enables direct replication and adaptation.

---

## Notes for Application
- LoRA-based RL is a practical path for adding reasoning capability to small deployed models without high compute overhead.
- The under-$9 post-training cost suggests this approach is viable for rapid iteration or domain-specific fine-tuning on limited budgets.
- For tasks requiring structured output (extraction, form parsing), the same RL+LoRA recipe could reward well-formed outputs without full fine-tuning.
- The 1.5B scale is potentially deployable in latency-sensitive production settings while retaining meaningful reasoning ability.

